Factors of the origin of double-entry bookkeeping in the works of A. Ch. Lyttleton and R. de Roover: an amateur's view
https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2023-1-121-136
Abstract
One of the cornerstones of the study of any historical event is the contexts in which this event occurred. As such, the traditional hypothesis uses the factors that contributed to the invention of double-entry bookkeeping and were described in the works of very authoritative English-speaking historians: A. Сh. Lyttleton and R. de Roover.
Among these factors, Littleton attributed the presence of private property, capital, trade, credit, writing, money and arithmetic in a favorable socio-economic environment. De Roover supplemented this list with factors of mediation and companies. According to Littleton, all the factors he named first appeared only in medieval Italy, which made the origin of double-entry bookkeeping inevitable in this place and in this era. The article shows, firstly, that the theses of Littleton and de Roover are not properly reasoned, and secondly, that all the factors they named appeared in ancient Rome, where they were much more developed than in medieval Italy. And if these factors really "made the emergence of double-entry bookkeeping inevitable," it would have appeared in ancient Rome.
About the Author
Kim Yu. Tsygankov
Novosibirsk State Technical University;
Siberian University of Consumer Cooperation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kim Yu. Tsygankov – Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Audit, Accounting and Finance Department; Professor of the Accounting and Audit Department
Novosibirsk
References
1. Littleton A. Сh. Accounting evolution to 1900 / Reprint. Originally published: 2nd ed. New York: Russell & Russell, 1966. 373 с.
2. Ruver R. de. Kak voznikla dvoynaya bukhgalteriya [How did double bookkeeping come about], Moscow: Gosfinizidat, 1958, 67 p.
3. Mathews M. R., Perera M. H. B. Teoriya bukhgalterskogo ucheta: uchebnik [Accounting theory: textbook], Moscow: Audit, UNITY, 1999, 576 p.
4. Kutter M. I., Gurskaya M. M., Kuznetsova A. V. The origins of digraphic accounting, Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010, No. 4 (14), pp. 235-243. (In Russ.)
5. Kuzishchin V. I., Mayak I. L., Gvozdeva I. A., et al. Istoriya drevnego Rima [The history of ancient Rome], Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2000, 383 p.
6. Mommsen T. Istoriya Rima. T. 1. Do bitvy pri Pidne [The History of Rome. Vol. 1. Before the Battle of Pydna], Moscow: Gos. sots-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, 1936, XXVIII, 892 p.
7. Luzzatto J. Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Italii. Antichnost' i srednie veka [Economic history of Italy. Antiquity and the Middle Ages], Moscow: Izd. inostrannoi literatury, 1954, 463 p.
8. Mommsen T. Istoriya Rima. T. 2. Ot bitvy pri Pidne do smerti Sully [History of Rome. Vol. 2. From the Battle of Pydna to the death of Sulla], Moscow: Gos. sots-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, 1937, 446 p.
9. Mommsen T. Istoriya Rima. T. 3. Ot smerti Sully do bitvy pri Tapse [History of Rome. Vol. 3. From the death of Sulla to the Battle of Tapsa], Moscow: OGIZ Gospolitizdat, 1941, 560 p.
10. Braudel F. Vremya mira [Time of the world], Moscow: Progress, 1992, 640 p.
11. Fevr L. Boi za istoriyu [Fights for history], Moscow: Nauka, 1991, 604 p.
12. Kulisher I. M. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo byta Zapadnoi Evropy [History of economic life in Western Europe], Moscow: GOSIZDAT, 1926, Vol. 1, 251 p.
13. Zombart V. Sovremennyi kapitalizm. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1. Vvedenie v dokapitalisticheskoe khoziaistvo. Istoricheskie osnovy sovremennogo kapitalizma: monografiya [Modern capitalism. In two volumes. Vol. 1. Introduction to pre-capitalistic economy. Historical bases of modern capitalism: monograph], Moscow-Leningrad: GOSIZDAT, 1931, 560 p.
14. Salvioli G. Kapitalizm v antichnom mire [Capitalism in the Ancient World], Ekaterinoslavl: 1-ya sov. Tipografiya, 1922, 188 p.
15. Mal'kova T. N. Drevnyaya bukhgalteriya: kakoi ona byla [Ancient accounting: what was it like], Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 1995, 304 p.
16. Villani Dzh. Novaya khronika ili istoriya Florentsii [New Chronicle or history of Florence], Moscow: Nauka, 1997, 551 p.
17. Kulisher I. M. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo byta Zapadnoi Evropy [History of economic life in Western Europe], Moscow-Leningrad: GOSIZDAT, 1926, Vol. 2, 352 p.
18. Blok M. Apologiya istorii ili Remeslo istorika [The Apology of history or the Craft of the historian], Moscow: Nauka, 1973, 232 p, available at: https://imwerden.de/pdf/blok_mark_apologoya_istorii_1973.pdf.
19. De Roover R. New Perspectives on the History of Accounting. The Accounting Review. 1955. Vol. 30, Issue 1. РР. 405–420. (In Engl.)
20. Keil K. P. O nekotorykh drevneishikh obrabotkakh traktata Luki Pachiolo po bukhgalterii: оcherk k istorii bukhgalterii [On some of the oldest treatments of Luca Paciolo's treatise on accounting: an essay on the history of accounting], Mogilev: Provincial printing house,1910, 180 p.
21. Koire A. V. Ocherki istorii filosofskoi mysli [Essays on the History of philosophical Thought], Moscow: Progress, 1985, 280 p.
22. Rutenburg V. I. Ital'yanskii gorod ot rannego srednevekov'ya do Vozrozhdeniya: ocherki [An Italian city from the early Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Essays]. Leningrad: Nauka 1987. 177 p.
23. Goldthwaite R. A. The Practice and Culture of Accounting in Renaissance Florence // Enterprise & Society. 2015. Vol. 16, Issue 3.РР. 611-647. DOI: 10.1017/eso.2015.17. (In Engl.)
24. Golenishchev-Kutuzov I. N. Dante. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 1967. 116 p. Available at: https://royallib.com/book/golenishchevkutuzov_ilya/dante.html (DOC format).
25. Burkgardt Ya. Kul'tura Italii v epokhu Vozrozhdeniya [The culture of Italy in the Renaissance], Smolensk: Rusich, 2002, 448 p.
26. Tsygankov K. Yu. Assessment of the quality of double-entry bookkeeping, the resources needed to create it and the ingenuity of medieval merchants, Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola, 2022, No. 3 (147), pp. 39-55. DOI: 10.34020/1993-4386-2022-3-39-55 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Tsygankov K.Yu. Factors of the origin of double-entry bookkeeping in the works of A. Ch. Lyttleton and R. de Roover: an amateur's view. Siberian Financial School. 2023;(1):121-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2023-1-121-136
Views:
160
Email this article 