Preview

Siberian Financial School

Advanced search

The influence of esg factors on the market capitalization of Russian companies

https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2022-3-183-192

Abstract

Investment analysis of companies using sustainable development criteria, ESG principles, is aimed at priority selection of companies with optimal environmental, social and managerial characteristics. There are discussions among foreign authors researching securities markets about the degree of influence of these factors on the market capitalization of companies, while there are polar opinions. in domestic practice, there is an increase in interest in ESG principles, both at the legislative level and at the level of corporate businesses, banks and rating agencies, however, a study on the impact of these principles on the value indicators of company shares is only being formed. in this paper, an attempt is made to build a relationship between the market value of Russian companies from various industries and their financial and non-financial information for the period 2018-2021. the source of the assessment of the effectiveness of environmental, social and managerial policies of Russian companies was the data of the rating agency "Expert Ra" and the financial indicators of the companies. the research revealed an inverse relationship between the company's market capitalization and effective ESG policy. Optimal ESG results, according to the research of the authors of this article, on average are a positive signal for companies with state participation, but negative results have been obtained for companies belonging to industries sensitive to environmental problems.

About the Authors

Dmitry Yu. Zakhmatov
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation


Gayaz Sh. Valitov
National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Russian Federation


References

1. Zakhmatov D., Vagizova V., Valitov G. Accounting for ESG Risks in the Discount Rate for Business Valuation // Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы. 2022. T. 16, № 1. C. 83-98. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.1.2022.83-98.

2. Ситник А. А. «Зеленые» финансы: понятие и система // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2022. Т. 17, № 2 (135). С. 63-80. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.063-080.EDN MQSIOJ.

3. Лазарян С.С., Никонов И. В., Хачатрян А. В. Эволюция, основные понятия и опыт регулирования ESG: Доклад НИФИ Минфина России. - М.: НИФИ Минфина, 2021. - 55 с. URL:https://www.nifi.ru/images/FILES/Reports/НИФИ_Экологические_социальные_управленческие_факторы_ESG.pdf.

4. Han J. J., Kim H. J., Yu J. Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea // Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility. 2016. Vol. 1. РР. 61-76. DOI: 10.1186/s41180-016-0002-3.

5. Malik M. Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature // Journal of Business Ethics. 2015. Vol. 127. РР. 419-438. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9.

6. Egorova A. A., Grishunin S. V., Karminsky A. M. The Impact of ESG-factors on the performance of Information Technology Companies / Part of special issue // the 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2020 & 2021): Developing Global Digital Economy after COVID-19. 2022. No. 199. PР. 339-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.041.EDN KOGRFO.

7. Zhou G., Liu L., Luo S. Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022. Vol. 31, Issue 7. РР. 3371-3387. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3089.

8. Qureshi M. A., Kirkerud S., Tran K. T., Ahsan T. the impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: the moderating role of industry sensitivity // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019. Vol. 29, Issue 3. РР. 1199-1214. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2427.

9. Chauhan Y., Kumar S. Do investors value the nonfinancial disclosure in emerging markets? // Emerging Markets Review. 2018. Vol. 37. PР. 32-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2018.05.001.

10. Chouaibi S., Chouaibi J. Social and ethical practices and firm value: the moderating effect of green innovation: evidence from international ESG data // International Journal of Ethics and Systems. 2021. Vol. 37, Issue 3. РР. 442- 465. DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-12-2020-0203.

11. Wong J. B., Zhang Q. Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels // the British Accounting Review. 2022. Vol. 54, Issue 1. Article 101045. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.101045.

12. Thomas C. J., Tuyon J., Matahir H., Dixit S. the Impact of Sustainability Practices on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysia // Management and Accounting Review. 2021. Vol. 20, No. 3. РР. 211-243. DOI: 10.24191/MAR.V20i03-09.


Review

For citations:


Zakhmatov D.Yu., Valitov G.Sh. The influence of esg factors on the market capitalization of Russian companies. Siberian Financial School. 2022;(3):183-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2022-3-183-192

Views: 1146


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-4386 (Print)